Yup, I can sympathise with all this (especially the bit about unintentionally 
rude or nonsensical - I was once warning a class of Germans learning English to 
avoid the word "backside" when they mean "back" or "verso" and managed to make 
precisely the same mistake myself in German while doing so - doh!!!).
Mercifully, I'm no longer teaching but translating, which is marginally 
preferable.
C

>
>  I also found it really confusing when trying to teach traditional 
>music in this system to French speaking groups.
>Given that tonic solfa allows a movable "doh" (Or should that 
>be "Doh!"? 
>) it's a very helpful system for singing with, as long as you indeed 
>don't forget which of the arbitrary names means which relative pitch. 
>But when you're familiar with that system, trying to then translate a 
>tune in G from the alphabetical name system into continental style 
>solfa, where the instinctive tonic "Doh" of G is now called 
>"Sol", etc., 
>so that players can sing it knowing which note they're going to use on 
>the instrument, left my brain even more confused than you probably are 
>after trying to read this.
>(Meanwhile trying mentally to summon my inadequate French in order to 
>explain the next bit of teaching material without saying anything 
>unintentionally rude or nonsensical at the same time.)
>:)
>Richard.
>
>On 12/01/2011 09:14, [email protected] wrote:
>>> I think in France they have a "fixed do" system, where mib
>>> =Meeflat = Eb
>> This is correct. At the Conservatoires they teach people to 
>sing the note names, which I personally find a pointless 
>exercise for various reasons, including the fact that they 
>miss out the words "bémol, dièse and bécart" (flat, sharp, 
>nat) because there is no time to fit them in. There is also 
>the fact that the note-names are arbitrary (they are the 
>initial syllables of the lines of an ancient Latin hymn - Ut 
>quaent laxis) and hence don't follow any pre-existing sequence 
>(unlike A, B, C etc.). This is also why C is often referred to 
>in French as "Ut", which is strictly speaking bottom C in an 
>octave, the top C (or do) being, historically "haut" i.e. high.
>>
>> It's very impressive to hear French-trained musicians do 
>this at high speed tho.
>> c
>>
>>
>>
>> To get on or off this list see list information at
>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>>
>
>


Reply via email to