he was definitely more man than I could handle, that's why I gave him an XXL t-shirt. but seriously, I makes you wonder why he has switched tactics back towards two wingers and then also signs a 9ft tall striker, presumably to get on the end of crosses from the two wingers, even though he took the decision to severely narrow the pitch. Just imagine how good a manager Mick would be if his brain was half as big as his heart. He may be passionate about what he does but sometimes I wonder whether there are any lights on upstairs.
________________________________ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 29 September 2009 2:22 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Re: This weekend It was an odd decision, especially given we are aiming to be the youngest, fittest side in the league. One would think that we'd want the big pitch to make other teams run around and tire more easily? Perhaps it wasd more about being able to press teams more easily. I assume you had no complaints about Mick's own width during those magical hours you spent with him in Perth? Is that why you call him "Thick Mick"? It's making my eyes water just thinking about it 2009/9/29 Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> I think the whole width debate is quite interesting. If Thick Mick ever intended to play with 2 wingers to create true width, why did he choose to reduce the width of the Molineux pitch to the minimum allowed under premier league rules? I think Halford or Castillo can provide the grit in midfield that would allow Milijas the freedom to be the creative force. Marcus Chantry | Associate Director Senior Product Manager - Macquarie Life Level 3, 1 Shelley Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia T +61 2 8232 4259 | M 0448 887 627 E marcus.chan...@macquarie.com P Please consider the environment before printing this email. ________________________________ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward Sent: Tuesday, 29 September 2009 1:46 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Re: This weekend It's going to be like this all season I suspect. Might come down to the last game to see if we can stay up. I'm still hopeful but I don't expect early safety or relegation. I reckon a draw on the weekend is a likely outcome. Milijas has been quite lazy from all the reports I read and we know what Mick thinks of that. However, a touch of class that scores the winner is worth 90 minutes of running around. I think with Milijas in we are also lightweight in midfield, especially if we want to keep some width. We haven't seen true width yet with both Jarvis and Kightly in the side. If we can have those two then I'd be for keeping both Henry and Castillo in. There's a lot of debate over 442 vs 451 on Mol Mix. 442 is probably right for us but we lack a true trequartista. Keogh is the closest we've got but he can't seem to score. Can anyone else fill that position? Is it Doyle? 2009/9/29 Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> So Pompey this weekend... they don't a single point this season; they have only scored 3 goals in 7 matches; they have conceded 13 goals in 7 matches; Are we going to add to their woes or are we going to join them in the bottom 3 and kick-start their season? Also, if Fulham & West Ham win their games in hand then we are in the bottom 3 anyway. The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
