It isn't looking like MM is the outstanding manager we are all looking
for. I think there were plenty who thought that even when we were top of
the championship (I still can't believe we pulled through that very
dodgy period to gain automatic promotion)
 
I find it interesting that whilst MM say's he'll be happy to survive
just outside the bottom three, Steve Morgan had much higher expectations
at the start of the season. I wonder if that has changed?

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2009 13:11
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Darren Ferguson anyone? [sec=unclassified]



This is getting interesting. I'm not sure one Sir Alex proves Marcus'
case. There have been outstanding managers but they're few and far
between and they then attract the sort of money and luck that Fergy has.

It is a vicious circle - "If we play well, start getting results..."
Don't we need the money (and a manager) up front so that we are able to
play well and get the results? I agree with Marcus that if we find an
outstanding manager and then have the patience to wait 10 years...

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2009 1:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Darren Ferguson anyone? [sec=unclassified]

 

As usual, I disagree.  I believe managers are responsible for building
and controlling the culture within their clubs, dictate the work ethic
of the club and the style of play for the club. The better ones will
also have major influence on the recruitment/development strategy for
the club.  A perfect example of this, albeit a rare & possibly unique
example, is one Alex Ferguson.  When he started Man Utd were very
mediocre.  He built a youth development system, he set a particular
style of football that he wanted his players to follow and instilled a
very strong work ethic with the young players.  This "Culture" has
developed through the club over many years and has made the club what it
is today.  The money has come as a result of the attractive football and
the success that it delivered, not the other way around.

 

Now I doubt for a minute that we're about to unearth another Sir Alex,
however, I think we need a strong manager to direct the major facets of
the club which means that similar to Sir Alex they would have a large
effect on the results of the club.  If we play well, start getting
results then people will want to pay to see us play, investors and
sponsors will hand over money to be associated with the club.

 

On the other hand, maybe we can use this research to approach the club
and suggest that they get rid of the manager and replace him with a
cooperative of NSWolves members, as at the end of the day we won't have
any effect on the results and we can't be any worse than Thick Mick.

 

 

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2009 1:43 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Darren Ferguson anyone? [sec=unclassified]

My concern with this is that you seem to be concluding that the manager
is almost entirely responsible for the success of the club.

 

I have read research in the past that says that the manager has very
little to do with the success of the club.  It's mostly down to money
and luck.  The manager gets far too much focus as it's the public face
of the club in the media.  The culture of football is such that fans
have been brainwashed in almost Pavlovian ways to thinking that the
manager is the culprit.  Fans build up into a coital frenzy of wanting
the managers head in exchange for the recent run of poor results which
is then satisfied by the orgasmic dismissal of the manager.  The board
can then get on with running the club without the pressure of fans to
"so something".  The fans have a snooze, or argue over who the next
manager shoud be.  

 

See this link
<http://www.wbs.ac.uk/downloads/news/2009/10/what-is-the-impact-of-chang
ing-football-manag.pdf>  for an overview of that thinking.  Managers get
sacked when results are poor but there's no evidence that it's because
of the manager that results are poor.  Subsequent managers fare no
better which suggests that managers have little impact on the club.

 

There are some managers that are seemingly better than others, such as
O'Neill but over the medium term most don't really improve their teams
beyond their relative pecking order in the league, which is largely
money driven.  The time when managers do count is when the relationship
and respect from players is weak, and that doesn't seem to be the case
at Woles.

 

There are examples like Stoke and Wigan that seem to be punching above
their weight but a lot of this is driven by money and luck.  The League
One table now makes interesting reading as it's littered with clubs that
have sunk due to financial mismanagement, which is the other side of the
coin over the medium term.

 

The first question is:  If you rank all of the teams in the premier
league by the quality of their first XI/squad, where would Wolves rank?
I reckon we'd be bottom three anyway

 

The second is:  Could we have built a better side, without risking the
future of the club?  I suspect not.  Doyle was willing to come, which is
a surprise, but how many other players of that quality were willing to?
Probably none.

 

The final question then is:  Would another manager do any better with
the players we've got.  I suspect not again.  There might be a honeymoon
period but that might not be enough to save us.

 



 

2009/11/11 Marcus Chantry <[email protected]>

No need to apologise Paul, I don't have much confidence in my own
financial acumen or decision making logic so I don't expect you or
anyone else to find much value from it.

 

I think for point 1 it's more around having experience at a top level,
whether that be La Liga, Serie A, Liga Sagres or even international
management experience.  Most sides would be very reluctant to appoint
someone who hasn't got a good record at the top level.  Whether it's
right or wrong it makes it very hard to get a gig in the Premier League
if your background is from lower leagues.

 

point 2 - we knew what we were getting ourselves in for when we
appointed Thick Mick.  Has has a good track record of getting teams
performing and even promoted at Championship level.  He has proven
(twice now) that he is not up to the task of managing at the top level
and therefore should be spared the embarrassment of being relegated for
a second time and let him return to the level of his natural abilities
ie Championship or lower.

 

which brings us to point 3 - For Balti pies and Led Zep concert tickets
we should be able to take our pick from any manager on the planet.
Assuming we can get Morgan to put together this attractive package
before Christmas, we can shaft MM and get a decent manager in place - we
will be Premier League Champions within 2 years.

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2009 11:05 AM 


To: [email protected]
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Darren Ferguson anyone? [sec=unclassified]

 

Sorry Marcus,

 

Your jumps in logic and assumptions, points 1,2 and 3, were not what I
implied in my email. Far from it. Sorry, I do not have your Financial
acumen / programming to make the conclusions you have drawn.

 

To be clear, my comments on your points as follows:

 

1.      Disagree. Firstly, look at all the foreign Coaches in the
Premier league at the moment. How many of them had Premier league
experience before they were appointed by their respective clubs? If you
have the talent and the backing of the Club then you do not need Premier
league experience to make it as a successful Coach. People like Steve
Coppell and Alan Curbishley achieved promotion with their respective
sides before acquiring Premier League management experience. As they
deserved, just like MM has after achieving promotion. 
2.      Disagree, MM has earned his chance to manage the Wolves in the
Prem. 
3.      Partly agree, if we were to appoint another Manager then yes,
you would think the club would appoint someone with a consistent record
of being  successful in the Premier League. How to do this? Pay them a
lot of money! Give them full control of player recruitment. Bonus scheme
for level of success attained. Free tickets to Led Zep concerts and
balti pies on match days! 

 

 

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2009 10:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Darren Ferguson anyone? [sec=unclassified]

 

I might be a bit confused this morning but based on the comments from
the previous emails it seems:

 

1) you can't manage a Premier League team unless you have a successful
track record of managing a Premier League team - in that case how do get
the opportunity to try?

2) on the basis that Thick Mick has a good record in the Championship
but a crap record at managing in the Premier League then he shouldn't be
our manager - he should always remain a Championship level manager.

3) if the only managers that are suitable for the premier league are the
successful ones, how do you get them to leave their successful clubs to
manager sh1te teams like Wolves?

 

 

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2009 10:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NSWolves] Re: Darren Ferguson anyone? [sec=unclassified]

Boo!  Thick Mick out!

2009/11/11 <[email protected]>

Are you serious Lee?

 

Posh are bottom of the League, that is why he has been sacked. Even
though I think it very harsh he has been sacked so quickly after
successive promotions. That said the management at Posh are obviously
convinced he can't turn it around. 

 

Okay MM has been bottom of the Premier League with us and Sunderland but
to my knowledge he has never been bottom of the Championship with a
team, far from it!!

 

Ferguson was useless down the Molineux, played only a handful of good
games from memory. Obviously has been successful as a lower league
Manager but has not made the grade at Championship level. What makes you
think he will be successful for the Wolves in the Premier?

 

 

Paul Crowe

Sales Manager - Asia Pacific

 

ConTech (Sydney Office)

 

PO Box 3517

Rhodes Waterside

Rhodes NSW  2138

Tel: 02 97396636  Fax: 02 97396542

Mob: 0406009562

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.contechengineering.com <http://www.contechengineering.com/>


 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Wednesday, 11 November 2009 9:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NSWolves] Darren Ferguson anyone? [sec=unclassified]

 

Just left Peterborough after two successive promotions.

 

Would be ok with Sir Alex as assistant

 

 

 

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in
this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not
guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or
opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or
opinions of Macquarie.

 

 

</DIV<BR






--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to