Come on Steve, re-read the previous emails. We're complaining about Newcastle 
daring to play attacking football in their first season back in the premier 
league. Nobody is complaining about Wolves and our formation. We're in our 
second season so we're allowed to attack, as our formation suggests.


________________________________

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] <[email protected]> 
Sent: Mon Aug 23 12:37:57 2010
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Everton first half 


Sigh.  I don't know what you're all moaning about.  
 
We played 442 away against a top eight side on Saturday, which the TMO brigade 
were calling for all last season.
 
Are you now calling for 433?  Why not go back to two banks of five and give the 
midfield a miss altogether?

 
On 23 August 2010 09:39, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> wrote:


        That’s right Rog, it’s all about putting in shift and grinding out a 
result.  Nothing mentioned about attacking in your first season back in the top 
flight.

         

        From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Rog & Reet
        Sent: Monday, 23 August 2010 9:24 AM 

        To: [email protected]
        Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Everton first half

        

         

        Didn’t know you were allowed to attack in your first season up.

        Thought you had to engage in a gritty fight for survival.

         

         

        From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
        Sent: Monday, 23 August 2010 8:59 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Everton first half

         

        Did I hear someone say something about a result against Newcastle? 
Here’s hoping that they wasted all their ‘good ones’ last night!

        JT

         

        
________________________________


        From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Rog & Reet
        Sent: Sunday, 22 August 2010 10:41 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Everton first half

         

        Certainly not.

        Could never imagine Sir Whingealot going into a pub and ordering 
something as limp wristed as a light shandy.

         

         

        From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks
        Sent: Sunday, 22 August 2010 9:39 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Everton first half

         

        But you’re not saying that Tony was Sir Alex are you? I thought he did 
well not to whinge too much at all!

         

        
________________________________


        From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Rog & Reet
        Sent: Sunday, 22 August 2010 9:15 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Everton first half

         

        Disagree slightly.

        The last few months of Rudd then Gillard was much more like Mick.

        Gutless, safety first, too timid to risk anything and thereby letting 
the opposition take the initiative.

         

         

        From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Steven Millward
        Sent: Sunday, 22 August 2010 7:27 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Everton first half

         

        Wolves under Mick is like the Kevin 07 campaign.  Predictable, 
unspectacular but very well organised.
        
        Gillard's campaign was like Wolves under Hoddle.  Nobody was quite sure 
how they got the job, they are all over the shop and don't really have any idea 
of how the things that are done are expected to get a result.

        On 22 August 2010 17:23, Rog & Reet <[email protected]> wrote:

        If she takes tips from the Old Mick she’ll be in the same state she’s 
in now.

        Has anybody ever seen Bitar and McCarthy in the same room together?

        Thought not.

         

         

         

        From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Steven Millward
        Sent: Sunday, 22 August 2010 7:33 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Everton first half

         

        Excellent result.  We used to talk about two points a game for 
promotion.  Surely we could get a result against Newcastle next week?
        
        Hurrah.  Intelligent Mick to stay.  
        
        Gillard should get some management and organisation tips from Mick.  
What a collosal cock up the Labor leaders have made.

        On 22 August 2010 02:08, paul <[email protected]> wrote:

        Yes, much better second half. Not pretty but happy with a point.
        Sleep well.

        Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra

________________________________

        From: Paul Taylor <[email protected]> 

        Sender: [email protected] 

        Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:55:35 +0000

        To: Wolves<[email protected]>

        ReplyTo: [email protected] 

        Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Everton first half

         

        Much better second half. We strung 4 passes together and scored from 
it. 
        
        Yay thick Mick. SEB is not made of stodgy porridge.

________________________________

        From: [email protected]
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Everton first half
        Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 01:03:51 +1000

        We’ve hardly strung 2 passes together.

        Haven’t remotely threatened their goal.

        Boo, Thick Mick out.

         

         

        From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Paul Taylor
        Sent: Sunday, 22 August 2010 12:48 AM
        To: Wolves
        Subject: [NSWolves] Everton first half

         

        Is anyone watching this bollocks? Can't believe what a shite game it 
is. Everton free kicks, then Everton just hoofing it forward. Bronx cheers from 
the fans when we finally get a free. The lads haven't settled yet are 
continuing to fight, then a dodgy goal against us. Lee Mason is having a 
shocker. Going to be a cracker of the second half if we come out fighting 
running towards our fans. 

        -- 
        Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid

        
        -- 
        Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid 

        -- 
        Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid 

        -- 
        Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid

         

        -- 
        Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid

        -- 
        Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid

         

        -- 
        Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid

        -- 
        Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid 

        -- 
        Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid

        -- 
        Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid 

        -- 
        Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid

        -- 
        Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid 

        The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not 
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this 
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee 
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed 
are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.

         

        

        -- 
        
        Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid


-- 
Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid

-- 
Pig's pudding - it's a mon's dinner aer kid

Reply via email to