No, only in my handbag!

________________________________

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
Sent: Fri Oct 15 15:29:02 2010
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hunt 


There's no need to be embarassed about loving a big strapping chap like Greg.  
Have you got a picture of him on your bedroom wall at home?


On 15 October 2010 14:56, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote:


        You're full of $h1te and now I've put that on record too! LMFAO
        

________________________________

        
        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
        
        Sent: Fri Oct 15 14:49:53 2010
        Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hunt 
        
        
        No you suggested Halford in preference to Hunt, Bia, Hunt, Fletcher, 
Doyle and Jarvis.
         
        You love Greg Halford.  He's your favourite player.  And it's all on 
record.
        
        
        On 15 October 2010 13:44, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> 
wrote:
        

                Don't forget I only suggested Halford In preference to risking 
Hunt against the 'ammers.
                

________________________________

                
                From: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
                To: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
                
                Sent: Fri Oct 15 13:42:33 2010
                Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hunt 
                
                
                Yes, we should try to get down to ten men as soon as possible.
                
                
                On 15 October 2010 13:31, Marcus Chantry 
<marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote:
                

                        Read my comments Paul. I want him purely to rough up 
the opponent (he doesn't have a silky skills)
                        

________________________________

                        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
<nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
                        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
<nswolves@googlegroups.com> 
                        Sent: Fri Oct 15 13:10:09 2010
                        Subject: RE: [BTMO] Hunt 
                        
                        

                         

                         

                        Sorry Steve, that explains it.

                         

                        I can see how BTMO Marcus would love to see Halford 
streaking down the wing mesmerizing his full back!

                         

                        They must put something in the Macquarie Bank tea?

                         

                        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
                        Sent: Friday, 15 October 2010 1:04 PM
                        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
                        Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hunt

                         

                        Well he has played in that position so he was an option 
I listed.  Marcus wanted to play him on the wing, not me

                         

                        
                        
                         

                        On 15 October 2010 12:43, Paul Crowe 
<pcr...@contechengineering.com> wrote:

                        What are you on Steve?

                         

                        Halford a  Winger?

                         

                        He’s not even good enough to play our “Hoof Ball” game. 

                         

                        I’d rather your Nan play than him!!

                         

                        Hoping the Hammers play crap and we sneak a win.

                         

                        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
                        Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2010 3:18 PM
                        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
                        Subject: Re: [BTMO] Hunt

                         

                        Hunt is a hard tacker though.  He smashed Cech's skull 
in.

                         

                        We're easy to read with only one winger.  Halford 
maybe.  After a dire game of football I could see us nicking a header from a 
long throw.

                         

                        The likelihood is that if we lose this we'll lose nin 
on the trot.  What's the record number of matches that a manager has lost and 
kept his job?

                        On 14 October 2010 14:26, Marcus Chantry 
<marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote:

                        If we’re going down, we may as well go down with a 
fight and live up to our misguided tag of being “dirty”.

                         

                         

                        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew
                        Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2010 2:25 PM 

                        
                        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
                        Subject: RE: [BTMO] Hunt

                         

                        Now, now Marcus, you can't be encouraging hard 
tackling. Danny Murphy would not be happy with you.

                         

                        
________________________________


                        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
                        Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2010 2:20 PM
                        To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
                        Subject: RE: [BTMO] Hunt

                        Not sure he’s worth risking in what will be a blood and 
guts battle.  I’d rather see Halford (who can tackle hard) or Edwards (who is 
expendable) put into the side than risk Hunt picking up another injury because 
he isn’t match fit.  Better to preserve him for Championship football where he 
has proven pedigree ;-)

                         

                         

                        From: nswolves@googlegroups.com 
[mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Millward
                        Sent: Thursday, 14 October 2010 1:41 PM
                        To: nswolves
                        Subject: [BTMO] Hunt

                         

                        Played 45 minutes in the reserves.

                         

                        Do we risk him in the team on the right wing this 
weekend?  If not who do we play on the right?  

                         

                        Bia?  

                        Edwards?  

                        Halford?  

                        Fletcher / Doyle?

                        Jarvis on the right with Van Damme on the left? No!

                         

                        I assume Mancienne will take Henry's role, with either 
Jones or Milijas.  If we play five in midfield then Edwards will probably be 
the third central midfielder so we still need some attacking threat on the 
right.  

                         

                        Big decisions this weekend.  Anything less than three 
points and we're in the poo.

                         

                         

                         

                         

                        -- 
                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

                        The information contained in this email is 
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or 
use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. 
Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The 
views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views 
or opinions of Macquarie.

                         

                        -- 
                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                        Before printing, please consider the environment. 
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be 
read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally 
privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by 
any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any 
unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in 
this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the 
views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately 
delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy 
or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. 

                        -- 
                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

                        -- 
                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

                         

                        -- 
                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

                        -- 
                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

                         

                        -- 
                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!

                        

                        -- 
                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                        

                        

                        -- 
                        Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                        


                

                -- 
                Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                

                

                -- 
                Boo! Thick Mick Out!
                


        

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out!
        

        

        -- 
        Boo! Thick Mick Out!
        


-- 
Boo! Thick Mick Out!

-- 
Boo!  Thick Mick Out!

Reply via email to