It'll be december before you have any fun!! ________________________________
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com> Sent: Mon Oct 25 12:44:45 2010 Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] 4 more games witout a win and I may consider the Priestood! Pity the wife when we do win! 2 - 1 win to the Wolves against Man City. Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra ________________________________ From: "Marcus Chantry" <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 12:29:11 +1100 To: <nswolves@googlegroups.com> ReplyTo: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Never seen you get fired up like this before Matty!! Are you on the same arrangement as Paul Crowe where you see no action unless Wolves win? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:27 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Fletcher's a striker. Play your best players in their best positions. If Fletcher's not one of our best strikers (on ability and form) we shouldn't then insist on finding him a place elsewhere in the team because he's a good player. Mick McCarthy gets alot of criticism for playing people out of position (and rightly so) because they 'graft' more than other available options in that position. Annoys the fu(k out of me. ________________________________ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 12:08 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Hi Leese, just my thoughts, how to get a good balance from the squad Wolves have, Flether would be very good as a Attacking midfield player and Jarvis plays more of a attacking winger/forward than a midfield winger On 25/10/2010 11:59 AM, LEESE Matthew wrote: So play our most expensive striker in midfield and our most creative midfielder in attack? That's proper Mick McCarthy tactics that. ________________________________ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:48 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] I wouldn't swap Jarvis with Milijas, If any thing in the my formation I would proberly swap Fletcher with Jaris. keep a straight 3 midfield, Fletcher can deliver some love through ball and can get on the end of a pass on the edge of the area On 25/10/2010 11:43 AM, LEESE Matthew wrote: Just lost arguably one of our best performers of the season so far. Most of the chances we had on Saturday came through Jarvis.. No good playing 3 strikers if you remove your best source of supply to your front line. ________________________________ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:38 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] Replace Jarvis with Milijas From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:36 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] 2 wingers (Hunt and Jarvis) in a 3 man midfield? That's proper Kevin Keegan tactics that. ________________________________ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:31 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick [sec=unclassified] What no Milijas? ________________________________ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 10:29 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [BTMO] Classic Mick I like that line-up. Removes the main duds from our side (Ward, Edwards, Craddock). From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswol...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Monday, 25 October 2010 11:27 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [BTMO] Classic Mick after watching the game my thoughts are that Wolves were a better team for knocking the ball around instead booting down field. as MM said in the interview Wolves have to be more committed in front of goal. I think regardlees of postion, Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher should be in the starting 11 drop Stephen Ward to the bench and put Jelle Van Damme on in his place. take off David Edwards and put Stephen Hunt on in his place. So my starting 11 would be Marcus Hahnemann Kevin Foley - Richard Stearman - Christophe Berra (c) - Jelle Van Damme Stephen Hunt - David Jones - Matthew Jarvis Sylvan Ebanks-Blake Steven Fletcher Kevin Doyle Just my thoughts, Swampy On 25/10/2010 10:19 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: Just in case you haven’t come across this on the BBC Sport website.. If only his tactics were as sharp as his interview skills… http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/teams/w/wolverhampton_wanderers/9121353.stm The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! ======= Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com <http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51> ======= ======= Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0..18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com <http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51> ======= -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! ======= Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com <http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51> ======= ======= Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com <http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51> ======= -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! ======= Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com <http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51> ======= ======= Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found. (Email Guard: 7.0.0.18, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.16140) http://www.pctools.com <http://www.pctools.com/?cclick=EmailFooterClean_51> ======= -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! Before printing, please consider the environment. IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out! -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
