Keane now out for SIX weeks with a calf strain. Shame.
On 7 February 2011 15:01, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]>wrote: > It’s interesting to note that the 3 teams you have selected are also the > teams that have the highest number of games where they haven’t scored = 9 > games. West Brom also have the fewest clean sheets so far this season (1). > > > > > In my opinion, West Ham are a reasonable chance to stay up as they added > some good signings during the transfer window (most notably Robbie Keane who > can score enough goals to keep them up). I think that Blackpool will > continue their current run of 5 consecutive defeats and fall into the > relegation zone. Blackpool have conceded the highest number of goals (49) > and also have the highest average goals conceded per game (1.96). > > > > For relegation I’m going for: > > · Blackpool > > · Wigan > > · West Brom > > > > Depending on who the baggies get as their new manager there is a chance > that they will put a few good results together as the players try to prove > themselves to the new boss. I hope they don’t get Roy Hodgson as I think > that would help them stay in the premier league. If Roy does go to the > Baggies then I’d swap them for us as the 3rd team to be relegated. > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Monday, 7 February 2011 1:31 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] > > > > I've just been looking at the fixtures for the bottom six teams. My > informed guess at this point is that the three relegated teams will be: > > > > 18. West Ham > > 19. Wigan > > 20. West Brom > > > > I think Birmingham and Wolves will get enough points from the teams they > have to play. Blackpool will just scrape by. > > > > Anyone else care to stick their neck out now and we'l compare at the end of > the season? > > > > > On 7 February 2011 12:48, Steven Millward <[email protected]> wrote: > > Don't have HD. I couldn't see it on the normal 2 > > On 7 February 2011 11:50, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Failure number 2. It was shown again in all it’s glory on Fox Sports 2 HD > yesterday afternoon. They replay all of the matches back-to-back every > Sunday. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Monday, 7 February 2011 11:34 AM > *To:* [email protected] > > > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] > > > > I am ashamed. I didn't realise it was tea time kick off. If it had been > shown again I would have watched it but I did trawl through three days of > Foxtel programme info to find the replay, which surely is a small form of > contrition? > > > > What shall we do on my birthday/Wolves do? I like the idea of a Middy > Marathon but I think my brain is writing cheques that my body can't cash any > more. > > On 7 February 2011 11:06, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> > wrote: > > You should be ashamed Steve. 4:30am kick-off should be a reasonable time > for a parent with a young child. Surely it would be very close to your > normal wake up time and for a match of such magnitude any extra effort > required should have been made, but to watch it 3 days late is just > appalling!! > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Monday, 7 February 2011 11:02 AM > > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] > > > > I need my sleep. I shall watch it on Tuesday night. > > On 7 February 2011 10:59, Rog & Reet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Milijas is my man and my head’s not for turning. > > Sure you’d be a fan as well if you watched us. > > > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Monday, 7 February 2011 10:50 AM > > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] > > > > No need to deny that you love Mick and Henry. > > On 7 February 2011 10:40, Rog & Reet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey, hang on a minute, it was only one pass. > > Maybe he thought Hennessey was running down the right and instinct took > over. > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT > *Sent:* Monday, 7 February 2011 10:34 AM > > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] > > > > Rog just compared Henry's passing to Milijas's.......I'm converted. > > > > Foley to the bench instead.... > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Rog & Reet > *Sent:* Monday, 7 February 2011 09:31 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] > > Yes, even a monkey typing will come up with something that’s not total > rubbish eventually. > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Monday, 7 February 2011 10:22 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] > > > > Are you *supporting* Mick in his choice to play Henry there Rog? > > On 7 February 2011 10:18, Rog & Reet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Er, can I be a dissenting voice? > > Think Henry does his job of protecting the back line well and he even tried > a 50 yard Milijas type pass, once. > > > > Never watched the match Steve?????? > > Did you think the castrati would put out the reserves again? > > > > We certainly deserved the win. > > Thought the inclusion from the start of players who can hold and pass the > ball like Milijas and O’Hara made the difference from the Notlob > abomination. > > > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT > *Sent:* Monday, 7 February 2011 9:58 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified] > > > > Everyone finally starting to realise that Henry is over hyped and > useless...and now I'm hearing he's in the England squad...what is this world > coming to? > > > > He's the most negative player ever....can't hold onto the ball and just has > to pass it back...he frustrates me so much. > > > > On a more positive note...Hamill and O'hara making a difference > already...if Macarthy plays Hunt ahead of Hamill he should be white coated. > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry > *Sent:* Monday, 7 February 2011 08:54 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves > > Definitely deserved to get the result. United didn’t create much after the > first 15-20 minutes. Henry is still tripe though. > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Steven Millward > *Sent:* Monday, 7 February 2011 9:52 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves > > > > Did anyone watch the Wolves match? I am recording it tomorrow. Was it > deserved? > > On 7 February 2011 09:48, Marcus Chantry <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Fickle supporters. Surely there’s nothing else to do in Newcastle so not > sure why they left. > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Rog & Reet > *Sent:* Monday, 7 February 2011 9:45 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves > > > > Happier than those Newcastle fans who walked out after 26 minutes. > > > > > > > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On > Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry > *Sent:* Monday, 7 February 2011 9:24 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves > > > > http://www.toffeeweb.com/season/10-11/comment/fan/17142.html > > > > > > *Marcus Chantry ** > **Associate Director **½** Senior Product Manager **½** Macquarie Life > * > > *Banking and Financial Services Group **½** Macquarie Group Limited **½**1 > Shelley St, Sydney, NSW, 2000 > * > > *T 02 8232 4259**½** M 0448 887 627 **½** [email protected]* > > * * > > The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the > intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this > email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee > the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions > expressed are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of > Macquarie. > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > > > > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out! > -- Boo! Thick Mick Out!
