Our chances are looking better.
________________________________
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com <nswolves@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Fri Feb 11 19:36:24 2011
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]
Keane now out for SIX weeks with a calf strain.
Shame.
On 7 February 2011 15:01, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com> wrote:
It’s interesting to note that the 3 teams you have selected are also
the teams that have the highest number of games where they haven’t scored = 9
games. West Brom also have the fewest clean sheets so far this season (1).
In my opinion, West Ham are a reasonable chance to stay up as they
added some good signings during the transfer window (most notably Robbie Keane
who can score enough goals to keep them up). I think that Blackpool will
continue their current run of 5 consecutive defeats and fall into the
relegation zone. Blackpool have conceded the highest number of goals (49) and
also have the highest average goals conceded per game (1.96).
For relegation I’m going for:
· Blackpool
· Wigan
· West Brom
Depending on who the baggies get as their new manager there is a chance
that they will put a few good results together as the players try to prove
themselves to the new boss. I hope they don’t get Roy Hodgson as I think that
would help them stay in the premier league. If Roy does go to the Baggies then
I’d swap them for us as the 3rd team to be relegated.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 1:31 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]
I've just been looking at the fixtures for the bottom six teams. My
informed guess at this point is that the three relegated teams will be:
18. West Ham
19. Wigan
20. West Brom
I think Birmingham and Wolves will get enough points from the teams
they have to play. Blackpool will just scrape by.
Anyone else care to stick their neck out now and we'l compare at the
end of the season?
On 7 February 2011 12:48, Steven Millward <millward....@gmail.com>
wrote:
Don't have HD. I couldn't see it on the normal 2
On 7 February 2011 11:50, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>
wrote:
Failure number 2. It was shown again in all it’s glory on Fox Sports 2
HD yesterday afternoon. They replay all of the matches back-to-back every
Sunday.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 11:34 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]
I am ashamed. I didn't realise it was tea time kick off. If it had
been shown again I would have watched it but I did trawl through three days of
Foxtel programme info to find the replay, which surely is a small form of
contrition?
What shall we do on my birthday/Wolves do? I like the idea of a Middy
Marathon but I think my brain is writing cheques that my body can't cash any
more.
On 7 February 2011 11:06, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>
wrote:
You should be ashamed Steve. 4:30am kick-off should be a reasonable
time for a parent with a young child. Surely it would be very close to your
normal wake up time and for a match of such magnitude any extra effort required
should have been made, but to watch it 3 days late is just appalling!!
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 11:02 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]
I need my sleep. I shall watch it on Tuesday night.
On 7 February 2011 10:59, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote:
Milijas is my man and my head’s not for turning.
Sure you’d be a fan as well if you watched us.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 10:50 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]
No need to deny that you love Mick and Henry.
On 7 February 2011 10:40, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote:
Hey, hang on a minute, it was only one pass.
Maybe he thought Hennessey was running down the right and instinct took
over.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 10:34 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]
Rog just compared Henry's passing to Milijas's.......I'm converted.
Foley to the bench instead....
________________________________
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 09:31
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]
Yes, even a monkey typing will come up with something that’s not total
rubbish eventually.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 10:22 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]
Are you supporting Mick in his choice to play Henry there Rog?
On 7 February 2011 10:18, Rog & Reet <rognr...@exemail.com.au> wrote:
Er, can I be a dissenting voice?
Think Henry does his job of protecting the back line well and he even
tried a 50 yard Milijas type pass, once.
Never watched the match Steve??????
Did you think the castrati would put out the reserves again?
We certainly deserved the win.
Thought the inclusion from the start of players who can hold and pass
the ball like Milijas and O’Hara made the difference from the Notlob
abomination.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:58 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves [sec=unclassified]
Everyone finally starting to realise that Henry is over hyped and
useless...and now I'm hearing he's in the England squad...what is this world
coming to?
He's the most negative player ever....can't hold onto the ball and just
has to pass it back...he frustrates me so much.
On a more positive note...Hamill and O'hara making a difference
already...if Macarthy plays Hunt ahead of Hamill he should be white coated.
________________________________
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 08:54
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves
Definitely deserved to get the result. United didn’t create much after
the first 15-20 minutes. Henry is still tripe though.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Steven Millward
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:52 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves
Did anyone watch the Wolves match? I am recording it tomorrow. Was it
deserved?
On 7 February 2011 09:48, Marcus Chantry <marcus.chan...@macquarie.com>
wrote:
Fickle supporters. Surely there’s nothing else to do in Newcastle so
not sure why they left.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rog & Reet
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:45 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves
Happier than those Newcastle fans who walked out after 26 minutes.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 7 February 2011 9:24 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [BTMO] Happy to be Wolves
http://www.toffeeweb.com/season/10-11/comment/fan/17142.html
Marcus Chantry
Associate Director ½ Senior Product Manager ½ Macquarie Life
Banking and Financial Services Group ½ Macquarie Group Limited ½ 1
Shelley St, Sydney, NSW, 2000
T 02 8232 4259½ M 0448 887 627 ½ marcus.chan...@macquarie.com
The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
email in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee
the integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed
are the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out!
