1)      They clearly haven't watched any of this seasons games if they believe 
that "his final ball is superior".

2)      He may have had plenty of practice but it certainly hasn't delivered 
any results.

3)      The only way Steve Bull would have benefited from any of Jarvis' 
crosses would to have been sat in the stands trying to catch Jarvis' superior 
crosses.  He'd have had no benefit from being on the pitch or in the box.

4)      Our England winger of "superior final ball" to Walcott has 4 goals and 
4 assists from 29 games, compared to Walcott's 7 goal and 6 assists from just 
19 games. 

 

So me thinks that the Guardian journalist doesn't know anything about Jarvis 
and most certainly has never seen him play.

 

From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Steven Millward
Sent: Tuesday, 22 March 2011 6:12 AM
To: nswolves
Subject: [NSWolves] Jarvis

 

>From the Guardian

Speaking of money well spent, Wolves parted with £600,000 (or 10 Seamus 
Colemans, or one-83rd of Fernando Torres) to sign Matt Jarvis, then League One 
player of the Year, from Gillingham in 2007 to bolster their flight from the 
Championship. Now the winger stands on the brink of becoming the first Wolves 
player since Steve Bull to be capped by England. Jarvis is no shock call-up 
from Fabio Capello, mind, merely recognition of an increasingly eye-grabbing 
season from the player in Mick McCarthy's increasingly eye-grabbing team, 
capped by his goal in the defeat of Aston Villa, their first in the fixture for 
31 years. While not quite blessed with the same level of pace as, say, Theo 
Walcott, whose injury has helped cement his elevation, Jarvis is anything but a 
slouch, and his final ball is superior. Then again, he's had plenty of 
practice: no player in the Premier League has crossed with as much regularity 
this season (once every 8.5 minutes). Bull would have had a field day.

Well Marcus, either you're wrong about Jarvis, or everyone else is wrong.

-- 
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.


The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email 
in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the 
integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are 
the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

Reply via email to