I'd say the small step approach seems a sensible and proven one - look at teams 
like Stoke and Sunderland and compare their recent history with that of clubs 
who have over committed financially such as Portsmouth, Hull and Leeds. Unless 
you've got a Man City type owner where you're not bound by the club's ability 
to generate money its not worth the risk. I don't doubt Morgan's business 
acumen for a moment and I think he's taking the club in the right direction 
with a sensible, sustainable approach. Morgan has pointed out that now is a 
perfect time to be redeveloping the stadium in terms of the financials as the 
building industry (and many others) in the UK is on its arse and so its a 
buyer's market where he can get the work done for a knock down price. The first 
stages of the re-development don't significantly increase the capacity of a 
stadium that was never half full (save for Carling Cup games), even in the 
super depressing Hoddle era.

________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Morris, Lee SGT
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 9:26 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NSWolves] Progress [sec=unclassified]

I've changed the title because it would have been too long with my extra bit 
added.

Anyway, Morgan seems to be working on the small step theory, which totally 
baffles me because he's just about to spend a fortune on a stadium which will 
be half full if the small step we made this year isn't 
enough???????????????????????????????????????

________________________________
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
mark worrall
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 09:13
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves owner Steve Morgan says he wants Mick McCarthy 
to stay on as the club's manager even if they are relegated.

Maybe thats based on Morgan only planning on putting in small amounts of money 
each year, and measuring MM on what he achieved with it ?

He wont get a big name manager in as they will expect lots of money to spend, 
which he obviously doesnt want to pay.

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Marcus Chantry 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What worries me is that Morgan has stated that Mick has made progress every 
year since he took over but when you look at how he's measured that it is the 
context of very small fractions or single points, so based on that run rate 
Morgan will be 100 years old before he sees us getting anywhere near the top of 
the table (assuming everyone else stays stagnant for that entire period).

Why can't Morgan accept that Mick has reached the limit of his ability and take 
the plunge.  5 years is long enough in most roles.


From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf 
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 9:00 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves owner Steve Morgan says he wants Mick McCarthy 
to stay on as the club's manager even if they are relegated.

Good to see we're both on the ball Mark.  I just posted a link to the same 
story on ESPN.

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf 
Of mark worrall
Sent: Thursday, 19 May 2011 8:55 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [NSWolves] Wolves owner Steve Morgan says he wants Mick McCarthy to 
stay on as the club's manager even if they are relegated.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/13440664.stm

--
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email 
in any way and should destroy any copies. Macquarie does not guarantee the 
integrity of any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are 
the author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie.


--
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

--
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.


--
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

--
Q: If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

Before printing, please consider the environment.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be 
read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally 
privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by 
any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any 
unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in 
this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the 
views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately 
delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy 
or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. 

-- 
Q:  If you could change one thing about Wolves history, what would it be?
A  That Peter Knowles was on the bog when the door was knocked.

Reply via email to