But the way he's playing you wouldn't select him in the team so his value is only ever going to go down. We've missed our chance to get any value for him.
Sent from my iPad On 03/01/2012, at 9:18, Paul Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > That left footed shank from Doyle should have had more on it. I tend to agree > Marcus, however I'm sure financials are coming into this. Because he's > playing like tripe, we won't sell him. > > > Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Double standards > > From: [email protected] > > Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 09:14:30 +1100 > > To: [email protected] > > > > Doyle doesn't look like scoring anytime in my lifetime. I got slated at the > > end of last season when I suggested that we should sell Doyle for the 9m > > that was being touted. We would be lucky to get 2m for him now and he adds > > nothing to our team. > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > On 03/01/2012, at 9:08, "Rog & Reet" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Berra should have been booked for his first challenge from behind on > > > Torres. > > > Maybe then the latter no red/no booking(Cole in particular)/yellow card > > > farce wouldn't have occurred. > > > > > > Our starting eleven would have problems opening a sardine tin let alone a > > > wobbly Chel$ki defence. > > > If Fletcher was fully fit and not starting it was more idiocy from our > > > GEM. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > > > Behalf > > > Of Chantrys > > > Sent: Tuesday, 3 January 2012 7:47 AM > > > To: NSWolves > > > Subject: [NSWolves] Double standards > > > > > > This mornings game has confirmed to me that there are clear double > > > standards > > > enforced by the premier league to protect the top teams. How on earth > > > Chelsea finished with more than 9 players on the field is beyond me. I'm > > > getting sick of this stupid fu(king money grabbing, cheating bastards > > > league. > > > > > > Also, why on earth did mick drop Fletcher? > > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > > > -- > > > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > > > > > -- > > > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > > > > -- > > Boo! Thick Mick Out. > -- > Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
