The bookies do take a risk with inside info either being deliberately used by those making the decision or the info leaking. The risk is offset by the percentages they give themselves, just over 250% in this case. Of course M & M could chose someone not in the book and maybe the bookies have a "Manager not mentioned" option to cover themselves. Got no idea the size of the hold, the odds dance around far worse than the TAB pools here with less than a grand in them. All in all I think it's a silly bugger bet designed to get bookies free advertising in the papers. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeremy Tonks Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 10:53 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Another day, another favourite Rog Can I have your honest opinion of this market? Are the bookies simply not taking ANY risks or are the punters just too silly to stop handing over their money? What percentage are the bookies covering themselves? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog & Reet Sent: Tuesday, 21 February 2012 10:42 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Another day, another favourite Brian McDermott now 9/4 favourite. http://www.thesackrace.com/teams/wolverhampton-wanderers Top 5 this evening. Brian McDermott Skybet9/4 <http://www.thesackrace.com/visit/skybet> Gus Poyet Skybet5/2 <http://www.thesackrace.com/visit/skybet> Steve Bruce Skybet5/2 <http://www.thesackrace.com/visit/skybet> Lee Clark Skybet7/2 <http://www.thesackrace.com/visit/skybet> Graeme Souness Skybet14/1 <http://www.thesackrace.com/visit/skybet> -- Boo! Curbishley out! -- Boo! Curbishley out!
-- Boo! Curbishley out!
<<image001.jpg>>
<<image002.jpg>>
<<image003.jpg>>
<<image004.jpg>>
<<image005.jpg>>
