Lincoln isn't the most boring place, I lived in Omaha for 3 years and found
Lincoln to be a pretty cool place. I'd rather live there than anywhere in
Southern Calif, NYC (recent events aside), or any other huge city area. I'd
bet that Rapid City, SD would be far more boring..... Nebraska is one of the
safer places to be, with all of the former SAC stuff in Omaha. It wasn't
always though, it used to be Ground Zero for a lot of nukes.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------+
Kevin Flanagan
C/S Planning Engineer III
I/T Implementation Department
Branch Banking & Trust Company
3261 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 116
MC: 172-85-01-00
Raleigh, NC 27604
Voice: 919-716-6209
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Duey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 4:16 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster recovery (was: Terrorist Attacks)
Maybe it's just me, but I would be looking forward to a big fat bonus & all
new equipment, and the chance to redo my entire network from the
ground up the right way. If there wasn't big incentives & 100%
replacement equipment, I'd be tempted to call it quits & move to somewhere
uneventful like Lincoln, Nebraska (oh wait, I already live in the most
boring place in the US).
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:55 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Disaster recovery (was: Terrorist Attacks)
I wonder how many admins will come back to work to restore a network. If I
was in that building, I would be on a month long vacation as of now.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Benjamin Scott
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:52 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: Disaster recovery (was: Terrorist Attacks)
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ed Esgro wrote:
> I just hope there Veritas license was valid and have a disaster
> recovery in place, because you can't get much more disastrous then
> this.
Disaster recovery planning guides usually make mention of things like
"major disasters" and even "terrorist attack".
I wonder how many of the businesses in the WTC were really ready to handle
a disaster of this magnitude?
I wonder how many of the organizations with people subscribed to this list
could sustain a disaster like this?
(And no, I'm not trying to be callous, or ignore the huge human loss this
event is, and yes, people come first. But eventually, business will be
attended to. Right now, I'm not in a position to help either, but I am
curious.)
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do
| not | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person,
| entity or | organization. All information is provided without
| warranty of any kind. |
------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
