Good question. But as it�s not my LAN - i can�t really say why they want.
The data that the want to protect is very valuable, but i would advise them
to invest the time into securing and tightening the data on the fileserver.
Possibly more a "want to have cuz sounds good" feature.
Thank you for your comments. Very appreciated.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 5:14 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: IPSec question
>
>
> I'm curious. You say this is a small LAN. What makes you
> think your data
> is at risk to sniffing?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Schatz, Daniel
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 8:04 AM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: IPSec question
>
>
> Two additional ones:
>
> If i choose the non-ipsec aware clients to communicate without
> encryption they would be as unsecure as before ? So my data would be
> endangered at that end ?
>
> I hoped to hear something like "Yes, there is a additional
> software/third party to install on top of Win98 to make this
> possible".
>
> Thanks again.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 4:59 PM
> > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > Subject: RE: IPSec question
> >
> >
> > Set the local security policy template to compatws.inf. This
> > will allow your
> > non ipsec aware systems to connected without security
> > enabled, but will
> > encrypt those connections that are ipsec aware. Basically any
> > OS before
> > windows 2000 is not IPSec aware.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Schatz, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 10:46 AM
> > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > Subject: IPSec question
> >
> >
> > Hy,
> >
> > my question is: there is a small LAN with mainly W2K
> > installed. Plan is to
> > make the network communication more secure so IPSec
> > connection should be
> > used. Would the remaining Win98/NT clients still be able to
> > communicate with
> > the secured W2K workstations ? Any good reading anywhere
> > regarding this ?
> >
> > Thanks a lot
> >
> >
> > "This communication is intended solely for the addressee and
> > is confidential
> > and not for third party unauthorised distribution."
> >
> > ------
> > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > ------
> > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
>
> "This communication is intended solely for the addressee and is
> confidential and not for third party unauthorised distribution."
>
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
"This communication is intended solely for the addressee and is confidential and not
for third party unauthorised distribution."
------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
