Shouldn't you have answered those questions before you spent all the money?
A lot of money spent just for file and print. First question to ask. Can one of the servers handle all the load? If, yes I would think active-passive clustering would be best. -----Original Message----- From: Sabo, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 3:56 PM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: Building a Redundant System I am searching for some suggestions about building a redundant system. I have already purchased a Compaq SAN (MA6000) and two servers (DL580) to attach to this SAN. My objective is to build file and print system that will have some fail over between the two systems. On these servers I will be running Windows 2000 Advanced OS. I guess my question here what is the best method to use. Should I go with an active-active with load balancing cluster? Or with DFS? Or will this be a combination of both? Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
