Raptor and Checkpoint do "True stateful packet inspection", they do not just look at the ip addresses (please feel free to correct me). Raptor has great filtering, rules, subnets, reporting, intrusion detection, and other add ons such as Power VPN. ISA may be good for a small shop with not a lot to protect but I would go for Raptor or Checkpoint if you want above average protection and reporting. Reporting is the key. Everything in Raptor is logged and can be emailed to you.
-----Original Message----- From: Sean Ohadi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:32 PM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: IIS, Index Server, and virtual directories. Does anyone have working experience with Microsoft ISA server? Can this product be considered as a serious firewall solution in a production live environment? Is there any information on comparing Microsoft ISA server with other firewall solutions such as Checkpoint or Netscreen or Cisco PIX? Thanks Sean -----Original Message----- From: /dev/null [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:46 AM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: IIS, Index Server, and virtual directories. Does anyone on these lists have experience with using Index Server on Directories that are created at run time, not indexing directories on the HD? Can you recommend some beginner articles or samples? Thanks! /dev/null email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.BeginThread.com/dev.null ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
