While you guys battling about Novell and Microsoft, I went out and searched last night on the net, and found the answer. Thank anyway guys.
-----Original Message----- From: Wes Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:59 PM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Setting up Windows 2000 network at home Hey I am a believer in other OS's I just do not believe anyone will knock MS off in the near future. OS/2 was far superior in its day. Novell I never really cared for myself, but it did it's job. -----Original Message----- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:51 PM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Setting up Windows 2000 network at home Wait a minute.. First of Novell's Netware does rule. I loved Netware 3.5, fast navigation, trustee directory structure, stability..! Netware severed a specific purpose and did it very well. As a file/print server Netware rox! Second don't insinuate that Novell used to be great, cause it still is. Just because your average Fortune 500 company is standardizing on Microsoft Windows 2000 does NOT make it the correct solution for everything. Think outside the box, man. Yeah, I use Windows, sometimes. It is part of the game.! I don't discriminate OSs based on anything, especially age! If you think Linux is post mortem, then think again. I am off to compile the newest kernel on my Slackware box. Penguin Power 4 Ever -----Original Message----- From: Wes Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 4:30 PM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Setting up Windows 2000 network at home Are you the same guys that use to say how great MAC's, Novell, or OS/2 used to be? -----Original Message----- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:18 PM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Setting up Windows 2000 network at home Yeah right! -----Original Message----- From: Jon Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 20 February 2002 7:42 a.m. To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Setting up Windows 2000 network at home I will second this notion. Sorry MS, but in the server field you can't beat linux. Jon On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, King, John wrote: > Linux running 2.4.x kernel, with IPtables, NAT, and BIND9.. > A 486+ with 16mb or more and 2 nics should do the job..! The software > is actually FREE, so you don't have to worry bout' Martin calling > 1-800-legit..! Plus it kicks ass, I know that this is a windows list, > but one must diversify. Psoinic's PortSentry is a must have companion > with IPtables.. Whoa, that is my vote... > > Good luck, > ~John ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
