If you have more then two Windows 2000 DC, then DDNS is already fault-tolerant.
DDNS, by design, is integrated with Active Directory. AD keeps all of DNS entries as objects. You can achieve high-availablity by installing multiple instances of DDNS because DDNS works as a multi-master system. Cheers, Leonard Lee -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pham, Tuan Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:29 PM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: DNS ideas ? I know I'm hitting this list with a lot of DNS question lately, but I want to find the best scenarios for my network. This is one of my scenario: I want two W2K DNS, one is AD-Intergrated DNS server(141.106.10.10) and the other is Standard Primary DNS server(141.106.10.11). AD-Intergrated DNS server is only open up for Secure Update only and Standard Primary is normal Dynamic Update. For internal network, Windows 2K clients and down-level clients will use Standard Primary (141.106.10.11) as their prefer DNS server and AD-Intergrated DNS server(141.106.10.10) as their Alternate DNS server. When any of the client logon to the domain will register itself to the Standard Primary DNS, from here I have to configure the Standard Primary to forward the information to the AD-Intergrated DNS server to update its dynamic DNS zone database (only authenticated client). I thoght this would give me fault tolerance. Does anyone out there using this method? Can you give me some inside tips? Thxs! TP ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
