Hear is one example of the need for admin rights.  

Needing to move from different subnets, and hardcoding part of your IP
settings.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2002 5:38 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Administrative rights


For us IT support staff have domain admin rights, developers don't.
Installing of software on devl/test/live is done by support. Development do
not get near it. Developers may have local admin rights on the devl servers,
but they have to document their install plans and hand over to support for
install into test. Developrs can also run their own scripts into devl DB
servers. Application support people (non IT) only get the rights that an
application allows them within the application (ie SAP admin). Rest of their
rights are boring user.

Development folks need to test in the environment that the application was
intended for - users . There is no need for them to have any more rights.

We run power user for all staff, have yet to come across a need for them to
have local admin rights.

cheers
Dean

-----Original Message-----
From: Wes Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 23 March 2002 5:36 a.m.
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Administrative rights


No one has hit on how they handle rights on systems for support and
development staff.

All of my staff are support and as is normal we are at odds with the
development staff who think they always have to have complete access to
everything.  

Part of the thing I am trying to do is to make sure all of our staff "eat
our own dog food" and follow the same polices as the rest of the firm,
namely your normal user accounts does not have access to higher level
privileges.  My staff is throwing a fit, because of course we are special,
even though there is nothing there is not a pretty simple work around for.
Now if we can not live by our rules it makes it much more difficult to sell
it not only to the development folks, but also for even an end user that can
come up with some reason why they might, someday, possibly, need admin
rights.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wes Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 11:28 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Administrative rights


That is my opinion also, but when it is the application used by your company
to write checks and they don't have a replacement you are pretty much
screwed.

-----Original Message-----
From: Szlucha, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 11:26 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Administrative rights


Well, that's an very poorly written piece of software you're using if it
REQUIRES admin rights to run, and it's just a regular user app.  IMHO, I'd
find something else that's written properly.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wes Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 12:23 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Administrative rights

The problem is we do not want them installing their own stuff, but the app
is insisting on admin rights just to run, or you have to open things up so
much as to make taking away the rights ineffective.

-----Original Message-----
From: Woods, Tony G AG:EX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 11:02 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Administrative rights


I'm quite surprised some of you guys even allow users to install stuff on
their own. Our support staff install all software if a user needs it to do
their job. Running XP, we've had to be quite inventive to get some software
running properly without bumping up their rights on the local box. For the
most part, the Compatibility Wizard has been a gem. If that doesn't work,
opening rights within the program files or the directory it installed to or
the registry have saved us. Granted there are the guy/gals that need local
Admin rights because they're an Oracle DBA or whatever but for the most
part, a user is just that, a user.

My $.02 CDN  ;-(

Cheers,
Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Jameson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 8:42 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Administrative rights


We here (in-house and with clients) are battling the same problem.  We
encounter many of programs that want an admin to install (ok, the RUNAS
works) but an admin to use the damn thing!!!  These programmers are nuts if
they think we are going to give admin rights to everyone.  I end up using
regmon to find out what the program is using in the registry and give full
rights to that part of it (at least for server based programs).  Local based
issues I am still trying to find a way to cure it as you are.  Power users
group does not always work.  Grrr.

Ron Jameson
James Hamlin Consulting.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wes Owen
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:20 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Administrative rights



Ok here is a specific.

3/22/02 Create-A-Check requires full permissions to the following registry
keys be granted to the user in order for it to work: H_KEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
-SOFTWARE
        -Borland
        -CAC
        -Create-A-Check, Inc.
        Microsoft
        Windows and/or Windows NT (NT/2000) (make sure rights are granted
for all noted subdirectories)
                Current Version
                        - Setup
                                Install Extra
User also needs full control to the c:\Program Files\Common Files\Borland
Shared\ and the subdirectories.  User also needs to be granted full control
to the network directory where Create-A-Check is installed, and all of the
subdirectories.

So if we open up the Setup key to everyone that pretty much kills much of
the reason for removing the admin rights.  I am curious how many more apps
we are going to run into the behave like this.  We have only tested around
75 of 600 applications to be tested.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:15 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: Administrative rights


When you say the applications need admin rights to run. I think you may want
to be more specific about that. Admin rights include a lot of user rights.
For example; Act as part of operating system. Add workstations to domain.
Force shutdown from remote system.

So Admin rights are just way too powerful. You should try to find out what
the application needs to function properly. Admin rights, is like saying you
need an airplane to get from Florida to NY, but you could really accomplish
that by taking a bus or driving a car or walking. As far as installing
applications, I would not empower anyone with this right. Just causes tons
of problems down the road. Before you know it, you have Bonzi Buddy on all
of your damn workstations.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wes Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:46 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: Administrative rights

How many out there do not allow administrative rights on the client systems?

We are attempting to put all users into the Power Users group and I am sure
you can imagine the stir it is creating.  There are applications that
require admin rights not only to install, but also to run.  One of the
manufacturers fix was to grant full rights to the Setup key, kinda defeats
the purpose don't you think?

If you do not put users in the administrative groups do you make exceptions
for support and development staff?  Do you use administrative accounts and
only give support persons rights on admin accounts or do you give their user
account all the rights?


This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you are NOT the intended recipient or the person responsible
for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you
have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination,
forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited.


------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%



------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%


**********************************************************************
This email is not an official statement of the Waikato
Regional Council unless otherwise stated.
Visit our website http://www.ew.govt.nz
**********************************************************************


------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%

------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to