We use MS proxy server and are looking to upgrade to ISA meets all your
requirements except for site blocking and traffic statss. there should be
add ons , see www.isaserver.org  csm proxy may be another option
http://www.csm-usa.com/
Good thing about ISA is its transparent NT domain authentication that is
included in the log entries, which is what you need IMHO for user acceptance

We use terminal services and ms proxy fine and dandy.
cheers
Dean

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2002 1:59 a.m.
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: proxy server suggestions


We are moving from a single SBS 2000 setup to a hosted, citrix metaframe
XP solution, including Exchange 2000 and Win2k AD.  The citrix full
desktop users will require internet access from the hosted server farm.
The server farm is on a privately addressed network behind a watchguard
firewall.

My experience with ISA is very limited, as is my AD experience (mainly
an Exchange 5.5/2000 background!), and we don't really need its firewall
in the new setup, I am interested in people's thoughts or suggestions
for a hardware or windows 2000 based system that would provide us with
web caching and proxy, that is robust, easy to configure, including site
blocking, traffic stats, and would scale to a few hundred light users.

What do people use?

Regards,


Rob Ellis

Network Manager
Profectus IT
Tel 023 9224 7960
Mob 07974 111867


------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%


**********************************************************************
This email is not an official statement of the Waikato
Regional Council unless otherwise stated.
Visit our website http://www.ew.govt.nz
**********************************************************************


------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to