Yes VPn may be "most secure", but why bother with a VPN , just use rules that allow TS port from IP range to ip range and use the 128bit encryption TS already offers.
cheers Dean -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, 1 June 2002 11:14 a.m. To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Secured Terminal Services connection over Internet An excellent example of VPN scenario. Andrew, MCSE (NT & W2K) + CCNA -----Original Message----- From: /dev/null [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 31, 2002 1:34 PM Posted To: DiscussionGroup Conversation: Secured Terminal Services connection over Internet Subject: Secured Terminal Services connection over Internet We have two offices both connected to the Internet. Both sites sit behind Linux firewalls. One site in NT 4.0 Enterprise based, the other is Windows 2000 Server. What's going to be the most secured way to get Terminal Services connections from the NT 4.0 LAN to the W2K LAN? We'd rather not expose Terminal Services to the Internet, is there a way we can open a secured tunnel between the two LANs that other protocols can run on top of, not just Terminal Services? Thanks! ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% ------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% ********************************************************************** This email is not an official statement of the Waikato Regional Council unless otherwise stated. Visit our website http://www.ew.govt.nz ********************************************************************** ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
