I've noticed that from time to time you whine about various Microsoft
products, comparing them unfavorably with other Oses.

Have you considered that your proficiency might have an impact in your
experience?

In this particular case, I would suspect that you have too many machines
(and likely the wrong machines) handling your domain browse lists.


http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/?File=Browser.TXT




 
ASB
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB
 


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Adam Smith
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:44 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: RAS


> Why do clients who log in via RAS

I often do this.  I was half way through an email and the phone rang, so
for some reason to clear my screen, I pressed CTRL-ENTER to send off
this email, without even finishing it.

As I was saying, Why do clients who log in via RAS see less than a user
logged in to the LAN?

Now I'm going to make some rash assumptions here, but that's because I
use Unix and I use Windows, and I don't have problems with Unix.

Users that log in and browse the network should be presented with a list
of ALL machines on the domain, just as if they are connected to the
network, but they are not always.  Sometimes they are even presented
with PARTIAL shares on a server and not all of them, even though when
they connect to the LAN, low and behold, they can see all the shares.

I am rather frustrated at this because it's something that's existed for
as long as I can remember.  This kind of crap never happens under Unix.
Always with Microsoft products.  And even though it does, there's
probably some lame excuse as to why it happens.  "Oh, some registry
setting by default is configured to stop any dialup connections from
being presented with a browse list, to conserve bandwidth."

It wouldn't surprise me.

"Upgrade to Service Pack 1 for Windows XP."  Ugh.

"Check to make sure there aren't any other protocols like IPX/SPX
enabled."  No, there aren't.

WHY does this happen and WHY are Microsoft products always to blame?

Don't even get me started on Microsoft's RFC compliance.




--
Adam Smith
Information Technology Officer
SAGE Automation Ltd.


------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to