>>You *could* get away with a P2?? Yes, I said *could*
>>Were P3's even available when Windows 2000 came out? Of course they were. At the time I made that statement, I had no idea what else would be running on that system. Hence the other questions I asked, and the qualification I made. The other software that needs to go on the system will affect the specs. ASB http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clishe, Jason Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 4:07 PM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: Win2000 DC You *could* get away with a P2?? Were P3's even available when Windows 2000 came out? Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew S. Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 11:14 AM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: RE: Win2000 DC > > > You *could* get away with a P2, provided you had enough RAM. > > What other duties would these DCs be handling? > File Serving? > DHCP? > Roaming Profiles? > > > > ASB > http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On > Behalf Of Brian > Dugas > Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 9:14 AM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: RE: Win2000 DC > > > 30-35 users > > Brian > > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 1:16 AM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: Re: Win2000 DC > > > how many users? > > --- Brian Dugas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How powerful should the win2k DC be? > > P3 level, or is a P2 sufficient? > > > > > > > > Brian ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
