One of our groups manages a clustered, 12 interface Checkpoint setup for our
network business. That box alone keeps about 1.5 full time employees busy.
Add the VPN concentrators to the mix (they have 4-6, IIRC) and that's easily
2 FTEs total. And they're busy.

------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:15 AM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Minimum VPN req's
> 
> 
> All good points Roger.  I can now see pros and cons to each method.
> 
> Aaron
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 10:13 AM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: Minimum VPN req's
> 
> 
> Clustered fiewalls bring their own set of issues, not the 
> least of which is
> cost, as you mention.
> 
> Second, separate firewall and VPN access points make good 
> sense in that the
> net result is less chance of configuration error, which can be very
> difficult in a single box strategy. And seeing as 
> misconfiguration is the
> number one cause of firewall vulnerabilities, I'd say that 
> risk of having
> multiple connect points is less than that of misconfiguring a 
> monolithic
> ingress/egress point.
> 
> And you really don't want to know about the third 
> ingress/egress point we
> just ordered for our location, either.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> Atlanta, GA
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 9:57 AM
> > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Minimum VPN req's
> > 
> > 
> > You now have another point of attack on your network.  Two
> > boxes to support,
> > upgrade, and patch for the latest security vulnerabilities.
> > 
> > If budget isn't a problem, install a clustered firewall.
> > 
> > You could also place the VPN box behind your primary
> > firewall.  In short,
> > there are a lot of options beyond paralleling firewalls.
> > 
> > Aaron
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Gonzaga (306) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 5:22 PM
> > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Minimum VPN req's
> > 
> > 
> > Explain why it doesn't make sense.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Aaron Brasslett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:12 PM
> > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Minimum VPN req's
> > 
> > Why would you put your VPN box in parallel with the PIX?  Why
> > wouldn't you
> > support the VPN on one of the existing PIXs?  Parallel 
> > firewalls don't make
> > a lot of sense.
> > 
> > Aaron
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Gonzaga (306) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 5:03 PM
> > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Minimum VPN req's
> > 
> > 
> > I setup our VPN box in parallel with our 2 PIXs. You need a
> > public IP for
> > the outside and a private IP on the inside.  Pop in you PDC 
> > info, WINS and
> > pool of address for that clients and that's basically it.  
> > It's fast.  You
> > can use your existing windows client but I'd recommend the 
> > Cisco software
> > that comes with the concentrator.  The client is a free 
> > downloadable from
> > cisco if you have a CCO login.
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lum, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:00 PM
> > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > Subject: Minimum VPN req's
> > 
> > All this talk of VPN...what's the absolute minimum equipment
> > to VPN if both
> > sides already have fast internet? Software/hardware. I 
> > currently dial in via
> > PCAnywhere to one site, but I'd love to utilize my DSL and 
> > their broadband
> > connection to connect.
> > 
> > Dave Lum - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sr. Network Specialist - Textron Financial
> > 503-675-5510
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------
> > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
> > 
> > ------
> > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
> > 
> 
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
> 
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
> 

------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to