You'd think so, but then we wouldn't find it so difficult to get proper funding for network security if common sense actually ruled the land... :)
ASB http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 8:08 AM To: NT 2000 Discussions Subject: RE: :-( @ auto respond Personally, I figure the recent rash of home breakins based on the content of out of office messages would be a bigger deterent. ------------------------------------------------------ Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:56 PM > To: NT 2000 Discussions > Subject: :-( @ auto respond > > > > To those of you who use Auto-Responders when you're away from the > office, PLEASE for EVERYONE'S sake read: > > http://www.goldmark.org/netrants/auto-resp/ > > Of all the list's I'm on, *this list* is the biggest > offender. For each > message I send to it I recieve at least 3 auto-responses from people I > have never heard of. Please, please, please read it. > > > ------- > > I just calculated these rough statistics: > > Average auto-response received per post : 2.5 > My average no. list posts per week : 7.5 > Average size of auto response : 3k > > > This means I could recieve 975 unwarranted auto responses per year! > > > :( > > > -- > Adam Smith > Information Technology Officer > SAGE Automation Ltd. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.sageautomation.com ------ You are subscribed as [email protected] Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
