Thanks, I will let all know how it goes and what we find...

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 9:05 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: WIN2K RADIUS from CISCO

It's a good plan, frankly. Last time we did it, we used TACACS and a
separate database, but I like one directory database.

The realms are just like authentication domains in NT or AD - think of it as
a domain name.

You might have to use the full domain\username syntax to make it work.

------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


> -----Original Message-----
> From: tuhlar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 8:32 PM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: WIN2K RADIUS from CISCO
>
>
> Ok, here is what we have found so far -
>
> We used a 3rd party RADIUS product - to troubleshoot this.  They had a
> default "test user" name. When we used that, it worked - when
> we used a 2000
> SAM or AD name, it did not.  It appears I don't yet
> understand the realm
> function.
>
> Anyway, to answer your questions Roger, cisco aaa debugs show
> that cisco is
> doing it's job by sending the radius request to the radius
> server - the
> server (using netmon) just gives us access reject (error 3 in
> radius RFC).
>
> The IAS logs are very useless, or at least cryptic, IMHO,
> that is why we
> installed a 3rd party product, and their logs helped.
>
> Now it is back to native IAS to see if the MS IAS will cut it for us.
>
> One note for all out there - when you install IAS, then
> uninstall to use
> some other radius, the ports for radius are still in use, you
> must reboot,
> this caused us much grief since all the other products wanted
> to open that
> port (1812).
>
> The reason for all this: we have at least 100 routers that we
> need to change
> passwords on every x days.  With radius, we can just have the
> router admins
> use their NT/2000 accounts.  Taking it further, with the
> alleged cisco/AD
> integration, we can set ACLs on a cisco router based on AD group/user
> accounts, so we can have help desk folks log into routers and
> have limited
> functionality (show running config for example) and still
> just use their NT
> accounts.
>
> That is the theory/project I am into right now!
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
> Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 6:56 AM
> To: NT 2000 Discussions
> Subject: RE: WIN2K RADIUS from CISCO
>
> IS the shared secret set correctly?
>
> What's the Windows side error log saying?
>
> What does the Cisco logging show?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
> Sr. Systems Administrator
> Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
> Atlanta, GA
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tuhlar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 8:46 PM
> > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > Subject: RE: WIN2K RADIUS from CISCO
> >
> >
> > True, been trying for a few days now, keep getting auth
> > failed from the
> > RADIUS server.  We think we have the Cisco box set up
> > correctly, but have
> > not figured it out yet.  We know the Radius (IAS) works cause
> > we can VPN in
> > from a WIN2K client - and have RRAS use RADIUS (IAS) for auth.
> >
> > But telneting to a router set up to use IAS is not working.
> > The packet
> > sniffer just shows the level "3" (access rejected) error, not
> > much else.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> David N. Precht
> > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 8:19 PM
> > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > Subject: RE: WIN2K RADIUS from CISCO
> >
> > Plenty of documentation at www.cisco.com
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of tuhlar
> > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 20:14
> > To: NT 2000 Discussions
> > Subject: WIN2K RADIUS from CISCO
> >
> >
> > Anyone have experience/white papers on win2K RADIUS with
> > CISCO?  We are
> > trying to have telnet into a CICSO, and have the router auth
> > with RADIUS, on
> > Win2K.
> >
> > TIA>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------
> > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
> >
> >
> > ------
> > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
> >
> >
> > ------
> > You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
> >
>
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
>
>
> ------
> You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
>

------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%


------
You are subscribed as [email protected]
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to