Is you proxy server a caching only configuration?
Yes ISA is MUCH better than PROXY 2. There are things to learn about it as well too. The hardware requirements are MUCH more than Proxy 2.0
What error/failure message comes up on those trying to reach the SSL sites?
At 08:15 7/22/2003, by wrote:
Dear Sir/Madam,
Current domain = NT4 single domain
Proxy Server = MS Proxy Server 2.0
DNS Server = NT 4.0 & Windows 2003
Workstations = XP, NT4 & Windows 2000 Professional
I am not sure which suitable mailing list to discuss my current problems.
This is about some Internet sites that my users cannot reach via MS Proxy Server 2.0 behind PIX. However if I enable the users to surf directly to the Internet via PIX, the user would have no problem. These are the https sites that users will be asked to logon with username and password for accessing the remote database that stores on remote Apache server.
I assume this is common issue to some of you. I am hoping someone can suggest me an alternate way of overcoming this problem. Somebody suggests to me that ISA Server would solve this problem because it has a better Web Proxy handling job than Proxy Server 2.0. Is it true? Of course, the easiest way is I must install, learn and test ISA Server performance.
For ones who can provide me some comments, I would like to thank you first.
BY
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.502 / Virus Database: 300 - Release Date: 18/07/2003
------
You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=nt2000&text_mode=&lang=english
To unsubscribe send a blank email to %%email.unsub%%
------ You are subscribed as [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=nt2000&text_mode=&lang=english To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
