On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: > On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote: > > > > It seems it would be more reliable and maintainable to copy back the > > relevant mount mtab update code to FUSE (and fuse-lite). How much code > > is it? > > I've checked. I think it's not worth. > > Moreover both mount(8) and umount(8) ignore mtab update failure.
Hmm, interesting. > So perhaps > FUSE file systems should behave the same way. Probably, yes. > If no strong objection then the temporary ntfs-3g workaround (not waiting > for mtab update) will be included in the next stable package along with > other important reliability fixes earliest on Thursday. Could you please forward me the patch? Thanks, Miklos ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ ntfs-3g-devel mailing list ntfs-3g-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-devel
