Eric Biggers wrote: > Hi, > > I did some more testing with zlib-like and multiplicative hashing. The > differences for the files I was testing were quite small. However, the > proposed > hash function, as well as a slightly modified version of it, did come out > slightly ahead. So it might as well be used. > > I also did a few quick tests with greedy parsing. In general, it seemed to > improve performance by 10-20% and increase the size of the compressed files by > 1-2%. If the performance improvement is considered more desirable, then I can > change the patch to use greedy parsing. For now it's using lazy parsing, like > it was before but more optimized.
I tend to be more interested in compression rates than in timings. I mostly use compression for directories which are rarely updated. Jean-Pierre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ ntfs-3g-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-devel
