Eric Biggers wrote: > Hi Jean-Pierre, > > I am willing to maintain the system compression plugin and I am planning to > make > it available on Github, replacing the older non-plugin version. I will add > documentation and tests, but I am not sure binaries are worthwhile --- often > it > can be assumed that people will either build them themselves or get them from > packages built by their distribution.
Ok. > The advantages of having the plugin source code in the NTFS-3G source tree > would > be that it would seem more official and distributions might be faster to > provide > packages to end-users since there would be just one "source" package needed > for > both NTFS-3G and the plugin. The disadvantage is that the plugin could not be > updated or released independently, which I understand was a major reason for > doing plugins in the first place instead of just adding the code directly to > NTFS-3G. > > I think my current preference is to have the plugin distributed separately, > maintained by me, and seeing how many people are interested. It could always > be > moved into the NTFS-3G source tree in a future release, if desired. Ok for me that way. Go ahead. Jean-Pierre ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ ntfs-3g-devel mailing list ntfs-3g-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ntfs-3g-devel
