Yes, I set the paths, renamed the scripts to use .exe for the scripts.
However, when I run texexec everytime I get an error saying that the
commands are not recognized. The only command that works is --verbose. I
will certainly upgrade to Miktex 2.1 (this afternoon, Australian time) and
see if context works in that case. MOst probably I will ask a few questions
later.
Cheers,
Luis
----- Original Message -----
From: Eckhart Guth�hrlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Luis A. Apiolaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Context Support List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 3:59 AM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Problem installing context with miktex
> At 16:17 07.07.2001 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> > >Just in case I am running ActiveState Perl 5.6.1.628, Miktex 2.0 in
> > >Windows NT 4.00.1381 SP6, 512 Mb RAM and plenty of HD space. Any help
> > >will be appreciated.
> >
> >well, there are miktex users on this list; is there anyone who uses
miktex
> >on win nt?
> >
> >is pdftex / pdfetex recognized as a valid program?
>
> Well, I followed the discussion, but I don't know what the problem is. I'm
> using MikTeX 2.1 with Windows 2000 SP1, ActivePerl 5.6.0.623, and
> everything works fine. I followed the instructions as Luis seems to have
> done it, set up the paths etc. Just to make sure: do you have a complete
> MikTeX installation *including pdfetex*? Did you add /texmf/context/perltk
> to your path, with runperl.exe renamed in this directory? (Don't want to
> insult your intelligence...)
> I tried without pdfetex on my machine, but my error message differs ('The
> command "pdfetex" has been written incorrectly or cannot be found.') The
> lines Luis has in his .tmp file, are they written by texexec? I assume
> this, so a problem calling pdfetex might be the reason. If not, I don't
> have any more ideas for now.
> Btw, I can recommend upgrading to miktex 2.1, the automatic package
> updating is a nice feature (well, at least for LaTeX users with dozens of
> add-on packages, but the context archive is not yet up-to-date, i think,
so
> knowing the manual way is always an advantage).
>
> Eckhart
>
>
