Dear Hans,
I checked the TeXbook and I noticed that I have used
\eqalign when I should \eqalignno. Sorry about this.
I am looking forward for more documentation on math.
Tar{\i}k
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Hans Hagen wrote:
> At 10:22 PM 7/16/2001 +0300, Tarik Kara wrote:
> >The \noalign command does not work as expected (as I expect) inside
> >\eqaling{..}
> >
> >When I type
> >
> >\placeformula[-]
> >\startformula
> >\eqalign{
> > \forall s_{-i}\in S_{-i} \quad
> > & h(s^{\ast}_{i},s_{-i})\pref{R_{i}} h(s_{i}',s_{-i}),\cr
> > \noalign{\hbox{and}} %
> > \exists s_{-i}\in S_{-i}\quad
> > & h(s^{\ast}_{i},s_{-i})\pref{P_{i}}
> > h(s_{i}',s_{-i})\enspace.\cr}
> >\stopformula
> >
> >the `and` is aligned with \forall. I was expecting to be in the left
> >margin of the page. Is there a bug (I am using ConTeXt ver: 2001.7.11) or
> >am I doing something wrong.
>
> The allignment is a box as a whole, so the 'and' will align to the side of
> the alignment. Same for plain.
>
> There are some extensions to the context formula handling that permit you
> to align formulas left / right/ indented and so on, as well as to define
> alignment classes. Yet undocumented.
>
> Hans
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
> tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
