At 04:16 PM 9/14/2001 +0200, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>Patrick Gundlach wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > is the cont-en.tws (and the other tws-files) generated
> > automatically? Will they be existant in future versions of
> > context? Will the syntax change? I ask, because I am thinking of
> > making a helper mode for my favourite editor (emacs) that will
> > offer the currently known commands and present the possible
> > options.
>
>IIRC, Hans explained some time ago that they are 'semi-automatic':
>the actual TWS files are automatically generated from the 'normal'
>context files that are used for the various documentation manuals
>(the input files that create the syntax description blocks).
>
>It is very unlikely that there will be downward-incompatible changes
>to the TWS files, I think. However, there has been some talk about
>extending the \startsetup with explanatory comments, so it is likely
>that there will be an backward-compatible extension to the tws format
>somewhere in the future.
indeed
i can add to that generating a tws is not that complicated:
texexec --once setupd.tex
will give you the one for the current interface. Setupd.tex takes the info
from setupb.tex and conferts is.
In the future we may move to xml for setupb [time ....].
Hans
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
