Monday, January 21, 2002 Hans Hagen wrote:
HH> Maybe a better way to go is the following:
HH> \def\showdnnummer#1%
HH> {%\preparethenumber{\??dd#1}\voorafgaandenummer\preparednumber
HH> \preparednumber
HH> \nummer[\getvalue{\??dd#1\??dd\c!nummer}]}
HH> and move the \prepare ... to (2 times) after \maakvoorafgaandenummer
HH> (==makeprefixnumber)
HH> can you test that?
I can, but it requires looking up everywhere in the ConTeXt core
to see where showdnnummer is used and patch. Hm, looks like it's
only used in core-des.tex. Ok, I can do that.
I'm going to define:
\def\preparednnummer#1%
{\preparethenumber{\??dd#1}\voorafgaandenummer\preparednumber}
(or would this cause too much of a slowdown?)
And there is going to be one extra macro parameter in
dodoornummeren ... which causes even more slowdowns. Ok.
Do you want the patches sent privately or publicly?
HH> btw, this (new) feature permits us to set the number-separators for each
HH> number class independently (so fig 1.2.3 versus table 1-2-3 and alike) but
HH> i guess that you already uncovered that.
Yes, the problem was in being able to use it ;-)
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
