Hans, It sounds as it is a question of taste. - To my taste I would be happy with a 'l' because when you write 'mL' it is pritty strange to read. - I do hope, that readers who encounter 'ml' are aware of the text they read. - Finally we should not concentrate on the DAU (Der D�mmste Anzunehmende User).
Willi ----- Original Message ----- From: Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Eckhart Guth�hrlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: ntg-context <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Symbol for the unit litre (was: \usemodule[units]) > So, given the replies, i think that we should change the "L" into "l"; user > can remap this to $el$ if needed; an alternative is to use a symbol liter, > that then can be redefined. > > ok? > > Hans > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands > tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > fall-back web server: > www.pragma-pod.nl > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >
