At 04:54 PM 3/1/2002 +0100, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2002 23:16 schrieb Hans Hagen:
> > >And did you fix the lower double quote problem?
> > eh, i remember the mail, was it an encoding issue (missing def in
> > encoding)?
>
>You do? I don't -- I told you in Erlangen, not by mail. ;-)
hm, anyhow, there has been some discussion on this issue ...
>I don't know what's the reason, but the lower left double quote ("99")
>is build from two commas (with *all* fonts), and these are too wide spread.
>First, ConTeXt should use an existent lldq from the font,
>second, if there's no lldq in the font, the two commas must be kerned
>together.
... which had to do with the fact that we need extend the current encoding
vectors with symbolic names for this.
this is in enco-def:
\startencoding[default]
\definecharacter leftupperninequote 92
\definecharacter rightupperninequote 34
\definecharacter endash 123
\definecharacter emdash 124
\definecharacter hyphen 45
\stopencoding
also with the double ones, and enco-ec and alike should also define them.
Can you give that a try?
[guillemots also fall in this category]
Hans
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
fall-back web server:
www.pragma-pod.nl
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
