On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 02:28:55PM +0100, Michael Wiedmann wrote: > * Simon Pepping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020321 20:36]: > > in contrary e.g. to the handling of PIs in DocBook DSSSL styleheets > *and* against my understanding of the definition for PIs, ConTeXt forces > to use a 'data' field in PIs (like <?line-break true?>) though > <?line-break?> alone should be sufficient. ConText stops processing the > current element content in the last case.
There is a strong tendency to view PI as <?pi-name pi-data?>. See e.g. the xml-stylesheet PI specification (http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-stylesheet). This is not supported by any specification. <?line-break?> is a perfectly legal PI. Perhaps Hans can take this into account in the scanning of PIs. Simon -- Simon Pepping email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
