On Sun, 9 Jun 2002 19:23:00 -0400 "John Culleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand that Pragma is working on the job of making XML coded documents > work under Context. However XML does not have ways of showing refinements > such as hanging punctuation etc. AFAIK. > So I have two questions: > > Is there a reverse path from Context to XML encoding? Not that I know of. But XML is as precise as you define it's dtd, so there is no reason why stuff like the XML code below would not be acceptable XML (tedious though). <opcode type="setchar" value="65"> <opcode type="x0" value="4000"> <opcode type="setchar" value="98"> So, the question is: what DTD do you want to use, and are you free to extend it if needed? > Is the loss of detail in this reverse path so great so as to make the use > of fine typesetting useless? > > There are databases of published documents that require conversion to > XML, hence my questions. > -- > John Culleton > Able Indexers and Typesetters > http://wexfordpress.com > > > > __________________________________________________ > D O T E A S Y - "Join the web hosting revolution!" > http://www.doteasy.com -- groeten, Taco
