At 09:38 AM 6/21/2002 -0600, Idris S Hamid wrote:
>Dear gang,
>
>Is there a way to setup, say, three levels of itemizations in a consistent
>way? For example, can I set things up so that
>
>\startitemize
> \startitemize
> \startitemize
>
> \stopitemize
> \stopitemize
>\stopitemize
>
>is always equivalent to
>
>\startitemize[n]
> \startitemize[a]
> \startitemize[r]
>
> \stopitemize
> \stopitemize
>\stopitemize
>
>It appears from the manual that this has to be done each time manually which,
>of course, goes against the TeX/ConTeXt philosophy:-)
and therefore, you can say:
\setupitemize[1][symbol=r]
\setupitemize[2][symbol=a]
\setupitemize[3][symbol=g]
(in this case a symbol is tried as conversion first)
Hans
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf
documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
