At 03:54 PM 6/23/2002 -0600, Idris S Hamid wrote:
> > >the default format gives the correct results (\bfc) but
> > >
> > >--tex=tex and --tex=omega
> > >
> > >do not execute the size changing commands.
> >
> > I cannot even generate a decent omega any longer with my current win
> > binaries
>
>Fabrice wrote me a few days ago saying that he will be releasing a new batch
>of 1.15 binaries as well as 1.23 binaries (so a user can pick the one
>desired).
>
>But if we can get things working for --tex=tex that should automatically take
>care of the toc and ch. headings problems for omega as well. I think footnote
>numbering has the same problem as well.
>
>I wanted to add Arabic to a report I'm writing in ConTeXt and I'm too far
>along to fall back on LaTeX
>
> > I wonder why it fails, since this is just rather normal font stuff,
>
>Weird indeed...
can you test tex versus etex ?
Hans
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf
documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
