Hi all. Just came across ConTeXt this past weekend, and I'm pretty impressed so far. It's still a bit difficult to navigate the documentation, but that's what this list is for, I guess...
Anyway, I note in (the latest) xtag-pre.tex, there is an alternate syntax for <?context-block?> documented: You can also mark blocks in the following way, thereby saving yourself some work: <?context-block what ?> <what>What do you want?</what> <?context-block how ?> <how>How do you want?</how> <?context-block done ?> <other-stuff/> ...am I correct in observing that this alternate syntax isn't actually implemented yet? I can't get it to work. Also, with regards to \hideXMLcontextblock and \videXMLcontextblock, how difficult would it be to implement a variation that shows *only* the context-block, and none of the XML tags that fall outside of it? (I expected \videXMLcontextblock to work this way, but I guess not.) Extending the above example, \hideXMLcontextblock[what] results in: <how>How do you want?</how> <other-stuff/> and \videXMLcontextblock[what] results in: <what>What do you want?</what> <other-stuff/> But what I am looking for is something where \blahXMLcontextblock[what] only gives: <what>What do you want?</what> Thanks in advance for any insights. With friendly vegetables, adam -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Computing Dept, Lancaster University +44(0)1524/594.537 Lancaster, LA1 4YR, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/593.608 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
