Rob Ermers said this at Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:12:24 +0100:
Introducing scedilla in the file, as you suggested, seems not necessary: Ba<c n='scedilla'/> soka<c n='gbreve'/><c n='dotlessi'/>.
Right. You've figured this out, but in case anyone else was following along, Hans's element-based solution used ConTeXt's internal glyph names (very extensive) instead of the more limited and must-roll-your-own list of XML character entities.
Remark:
a thord alternative, the &scedilla; approach, has as disadvantage that xml processors (xslt, parsers, databases) like to resolve entities; this is why i sometimes use the <c n='...'/> approach;
numbered entities should work ok, but some vectors may not yet be defined
Hans
----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context