On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 02:31:04PM +0200, Piotr Kopszak wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 11:03:53PM +0200, Patrick Gundlach wrote: > >[...] > > I just looked at the webpage you mentioned and TeXML resources. If > I'm not mistaken it seems it was conceived for LaTeX. Does it > really make sense in context of ConTeXt? I'm afraid having a language > whose available reference does not even mention ConTeXt only adds up to the > existing TeX mess rather than makes it richer. At least the subset > which makes use of ConTeXt should be called differently. Sorry for my > ignorance. These are just first impressions after having a quick look > at the idea. >
It is true that originally this was designed just for LaTeX. But I became a developer and changed the code so that it will work under ConTeXt. I even provided a script that will convert TeXML directly from XML to PDF or other print formats. The name of this script is texml_con. It is only available on CVS right now, but I should make it available as a package sometime later today. I will have to aske the administrator of the sourceforge site to update the webpage so that it mentions ConTeXt as well. I provide myriads of examples on the webpages in TeXML format. Running the TeXML script on any of these codes will change the documents to valid ConTeXt. Paul -- ************************ *Paul Tremblay * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * ************************ _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
