Vit Zyka said this at Sun, 10 Apr 2005 22:31:50 +0200: >> I'd call your st1 an EC variant, st2 an XL2 variant, and st3 some sort of >> custom expert encoding. Ultimately names aren't *that* important, but >> they can help a lot when others try to pick up and understand your work. > >Thank you Adam for your suggestion. Your naming convention has a logic. >The reason why I do not use it is that I utilized work of Petr Olsak. I >am using all *.tfm, *.map and *.enc files. I believe it is not a >drawback for ConTeXt but it is advantage for me: do not prepare hundreds >of metric files.
I actually had gone back and re-thought that suggestion (especially after examining Olsak's OFS in further detail). As the st1 does have *character* (and not just *glyph*) differences from EC, it really is a different encoding. Again, great stuff. Thanks! -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay, Computing Dept. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lancaster University, InfoLab21 +44(0)1524/510.514 Lancaster, LA1 4WA, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/510.492 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
