VnPenguin wrote: > Just tested your context.vim under vim 6.3.x; It's better than > tex/latex standard syntax in vim 6.3 IMHO.
Great, thanks! > I have only a small remark: The following code is valid in ConTeXt: > > \useURL [book-ns-openssl][http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/ > 059600270X/qid%3D1024342376/103-8123753-9606263][][Network > Security with OpenSSL] > but the syntax considers % like a comment mark, so I see another color > for the text after %. > It's possible to make the comment pattern smarter ? :) Hm, probably not. The problem with TeX is that it's so goddam flexible when it comes to "syntax". The whole deal with turning $ on and off, % into something else, and so on is really hard to capture in a syntax highlighter. To do so successfully, the highlighter would more or less have to parse the TeX document itself to understand when and where to do what. I guess special cases like the one above (with a very weird URL indeed) so that \useURL would be parsed differently, but it's impossible to always get these things right, nikolai -- Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/! Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden. main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);} _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list ntg-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
