Am Montag, 14. August 2023, 13:33:33 CEST schrieb Hans Hagen:
> On 8/14/2023 1:16 PM, Gerion Entrup wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I try to typeset a nested align in a formula. However, the results looks
> > really wrong. Here is a MWE:
> >
> > ```
> > \starttext
> > \startformula
> > \startalign
> > \NC a = \NC (b, c) \quad \text{with}\NR
> > \NC \NC \startalign
> > \NC b \NC = something \NR
> > \NC c \NC = someother \NR
> > \stopalign \NR
> > \NC somelong = \NC bla \NR
> > \stopalign
> > \stopformula
> > \stoptext
> > ```
> > Am I doing something wrong or are nested aligns not possible?
> it will work if you configure the inner align to be tight (i delegate
> that answer)
>
> \startformula
> a = \alignhere (b, c) \quad \text{with}
> \breakhere b = \text{something}
> \breakhere c = \text{someother}
> \breakhere
> \text{somelong} = \alignhere bla
> \stopformula
>
> might be okay for your purpose
Thanks, but unfortunately not. I guess, I simplified the MWE too much.
This does not align the b and c. It should become clear here:
```
\startformula
a = \alignhere (b, thisislonger) \quad \text{with}
\breakhere b = \text{something}
\breakhere thisislonger = \text{someother}
\breakhere
\text{somelong} = \alignhere bla
\stopformula
```
Gerion
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : [email protected] / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
