On 9/25/23 21:57, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > Am 25.09.23 um 19:19 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez: >> On 9/25/23 18:19, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: >>> Am 25.09.23 um 17:52 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez: >>>> [...] >>>> Excuse my ignorance, but which is the right way to get the itemize setup >>>> only for footnotes? >>> >>> I would use \defineitemgroup to define your own, like "footnoteitemize". >> >> Many thanks for your reply, Hraban. >> >> It works fine, but I wonder why the itemize itemgroup should be avoided. > > I didn’t say you should avoid it; defining your own version was just the > first idea that I had – and apparently it wasn’t a bad idea.
Sorry, Hraban, your proposal works perfectly fine and I really appreciate it. It was only me the one that had the impression that standard itemize has be avoided in footnotes (to get \setupitemgroup working there). > I’m sure there are several other approaches. Sorry again, many thanks for your help, Pablo ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
