On 9/25/23 21:57, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
> Am 25.09.23 um 19:19 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez:
>> On 9/25/23 18:19, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
>>> Am 25.09.23 um 17:52 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez:
>>>> [...]
>>>> Excuse my ignorance, but which is the right way to get the itemize setup
>>>> only for footnotes?
>>> I would use \defineitemgroup to define your own, like "footnoteitemize".
>> Many thanks for your reply, Hraban.
>> It works fine, but I wonder why the itemize itemgroup should be avoided.
> I didn’t say you should avoid it; defining your own version was just the
> first idea that I had – and apparently it wasn’t a bad idea.

Sorry, Hraban, your proposal works perfectly fine and I really
appreciate it.

It was only me the one that had the impression that standard itemize has
be avoided in footnotes (to get \setupitemgroup working there).

> I’m sure there are several other approaches.

Sorry again, many thanks for your help,


If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : https://contextgarden.net

Reply via email to