Hi, indeed, one can be surprised. The good thing is that you will now update the wiki, right? :)
/Mikael PS I think the "official announcement" was made on the list, but I do not remember the exact date. On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 12:23 PM wolfgangbackes--- via ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl> wrote: > > By the way, if it's been a few years since the changeover, isn't it > surprising that the examples on the contextgarden website still use the old > syntax? > Are you aware of an official announcement of the new syntax? After all, this > seems to mean that old texts are no longer rendered correctly, at least not > after a new PDF generation. This is no small matter. > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the > Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / > https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl > webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) > archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context > wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
