On 4/29/24 18:04, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > Pablo Rodriguez via ntg-context schrieb am 29.04.2024 um 17:22: >> [...] >> Which is the right way to use "interfaces.definecommand" to get a simple >> command as in standard TeX? >> >> I mean, no a non \permanent or non \protected command. > > You can't create unprotected command with interfaces.definecommand > but this not a problem because you can just use interfaces.implement > to create your command which is then unprotected by default. Using > implement instead of definecommand doesn't matter because > definecommand is just a wrapper for the implement function with the > option to create a environment.
Many thanks for your fast reply, Wolfgang. I’m reading it now in cld-mkiv.pdf. Is \protected the same as \unexpanded? Many thanks for your help again, Pablo ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
