On 4/25/25 10:32, Ulrike Fischer wrote: > Am Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:38:26 +0200 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez via > ntg-context: >> [...] >> I thought that PDF/UA-1 didn’t allow (or at least, require) mathml. > > Yes, PDF/UA-1 is basically unusable for sensible math tagging. > > If you really want to produce accessible math (and not only fool > some validator) then you should use PDF 2.0 and UA-2 and MathML > (either as structure elements or as associated file on the Formula > tag).
Many thanks for your reply, Ulrike, the issue I see is that we don’t have PDF/A-4f for PDF/UA-2, so there would be no way to use images with math. That being said, I have just discovered that there is an associated file for all math content in both PDF/UA-1 and PDF/UA-2 (although it has other problems in PDF/UA-2). Many thanks for your help, Pablo ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://mailman.ntg.nl/mailman3/lists/ntg-context.ntg.nl webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / https://context.aanhet.net (mirror) archive : https://github.com/contextgarden/context wiki : https://wiki.contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
